Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Project 365: Day 102


Day 102, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

This place is off-the-chains. Cassell's in Koreatown is literally next door to my office. It's seriously an OG burger joint with freshly ground beef (made in AM), hand cut fries, and a buffet that includes canned peaches, cottage juice, and handmade mayonnaise.

Totally weird. Totally LA.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Project 365: Day 101


Day 101, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Happy 29th Birthday Sean! In theory, I should have taken a picture of the birthday boy, the massive amount of sangria consumed, or the competitive game of bocce ball. But I left my camera at home so this is the most interesting them I captured today; the promotion of the new X-Men Movie.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Project 365: Day 100


Day 100, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Shalimar's Secret Sangria

RECIPE INGREDIENTS
1 orange, cut into 1/8-inch slices
1 lemon
1 cup sugar
1 bottle dry white wine
1 bottle dry red wine
Sliced peaches, grapes, strawberries, or other seasonal fruit
Gin, grand marnier, or brandy to taste (optional)

Put it all in a pitcher, let sit at least 4 hours, add ice. enjoy.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Project 365: Day 99



I should add this weekend to my list of LA "firsts". I went to Lightning In a Bottle, a SoCal festival filled with yoga, kombucha, dancing, dirty music, good vibes, and lots of patchouli. Think I'm joking? Check out these workshops:
  • Hydroponic Gardening
  • Discover the “art of being” (I still don't know what this was supposed to be about)
  • Gift Circles and Gifting Economies
  • Rite of Passage: The Natural Path to Leadership
  • Resilient Community Organizing

After spending 2 days with the "Nail Crew", I headed back to the real world of Mob Wives, Oprah's final episode, and Candace's cooking.

Complete photo series after the jump....




LIB4At Lightning in a Bottle with my friends Lucent DossierAt Lightning in a Bottle with my friends Lucent DossierLIB7LIB8LIB9
LIB10LIB11LIB12LIB14LIB20LIB13
LIB15LIB16LIB17LIB18LIB19LIB21
LIB22LIB23LIB24LIB25LIB26LIB27
LIB 2011, a set on Flickr.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Project 365: Day 98


Day 98, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Having a car fucking rocks! I'm on my way to some ranch in the middle of SoCal for Lightning in a Bottle. (Think of it like Burning Man with more yoga)Despite debating for months on whether I should I attend, I decided, thanks to Twitter, to go for it. A group invited me to share their campsite and show me the ropes.

Armed with my camera, water bottle, and ipod, this is going to be EPIC. Pics to come shortly.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Project 365: Day 97


Day 97, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Have you ever though to yourself, "I wonder what $80 worth of trail mix looks like? Well, your question has now been asnwered. Shira, aka "The Mule" loaded up her suitcase with 2 giant bags on trail mix, protein powder from Madison Market, and several back issues of the New Yorker.
Why the trail mix? Well, after visiting several  Whole Foods, I learned that not all trail mix is created equal, nor sold at all stores. This means my favorite Mt.Washington mix can only be purchased in SEA.

Attention future guests from SEA, I expect the same.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Project 365: Day 96


Day 96, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

It should come as no suprise to anyone that knows both Shira and I, that we are very different. Although after comparing notes, it seems we might be more similar than originally (apparently 3 years of "originally") thought. But still, it got me thinking is is possible for people that have different professions, different religions, or different eating habits last?


It’s typically incompatibilities than end a relationship. She’s a Mormon, you’re a man. He’s a banker, you just got back from Peace Corp. She went to Notre Dame, you went to BC/USC/Georgetown/Michigan/Stanford/Villanova. This is not a revolutionary concept.


Heavy hitters tend to be religion, level of intelligence, and cheating style, but a few recent conversations (slash nights) have made me wonder how the issue of compatibility plays out on the alcohol front. People are quick to say, “I could never be with a drug addict” or “stoners are a deal breaker”, but where is the fine (crooked?) line drawn on the issue of libations? Can you survive with someone whose drinking tendencies are dramatically different than yours?


From my research and experience here are the issues:


One drinks, one teetotals (doesn’t)
Second to screaming babies on an airplane, being around drunk people when you are sober is the most excruciating thing known to modern man. The most fun-loving, totally non-judgmental, stay-out-‘til-5am sober people are a delight, but are not drunk. They don’t make drunk decisions or have drunk appetites or want to make out in the middle of the dance floor. They, unlike their drunk worse-half, can see the people around them. This relationship is fantastic for the drinker who essentially has a free body guard who sleeps with them (unlike a bodyguard you pay for and then sleep with), but it makes sober sally a custodian (if you vomit)/lawyer (if you strip) and therapist (when you wake up guilt-ridden and poor). Also, why don’t they drink at all ever? There are 1-2 reasons that are legit and respectful and 2-4 that are giant red flags.




A binge drinker and a social drinker

Some people drink to enjoy a delicious beverage that happens to be alcoholic. Others drink to get drunk off whatever is available. Then there’s that selective set that drink and always get drunk because they don’t know how to stop enjoying a delicious beverage slash whatever is available. Parents and doctors call this set “binge drinkers”. I call them my friends.


Point being: there is a distinct difference between a drinker and someone who drinks. As it applies to a relationship, issues are as follows:


  • One person costs way more than the other person when out
  • One person remembers way more than the other person the next day
  • Alcohol affects some people’s performance in the boudoir – so if you’re the drinker and the guy that’s dick (pun intended)
  • People are judgmental about other people’s willpower. So you end up dealing with the whole, “I don’t understand what you can’t just enjoy 4 vodka sodas instead of 11” fight
  • Binge drinkers deny that they binge drink (and generally hate people who are judgemental) "First of all, it was 9 not 11, and because I unlike some people, know how to have a good time."
Both just drink a ton
Logic would suggest this has the greatest likelihood of success considering the issue is compatibility, but there a bit of that old “if a tree falls” adage going on. If neither person is ever really sober in a relationship – is it actually happening?


Both are sober
Aww – that’s sweet, but then how did they have sex for the first time?




Old habits die hard and drinking habits die harder, so to adapt the advertiser’s credo: Drink as you will, but try to relate responsibly.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Project 365: Day 94


Day 94, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Between my visits to San Pedro and Gardena this morning/early afternoon, I spent a few minutes taking a gander at the city of my birth. Yes, although I claim to be a Bay Area girl (as does everyone in my family), it should be pointed out that I was born right here in LA County.
Speaking of born days and baby daddies something about this whole Arnold Schwarzenegger as baby-daddy ordeal struck me as strange.

No, it wasn't the fact that Arnold hid a love child from his wife of 25 years nor was it that the love child was the product of an affair with a member of his house staff. Sadly, I didn't find all of that particularly shocking.

What was strange in my admittedly desensitized look was this statement in the article from
The LA Times.

"To protect their privacy, The Times is not publishing the former staffer's name nor that of her child."

I'm not sure how I feel about their omission of the staffer's name. I am all for protecting the privacy of others, especially young children, but in this case I'm not sure I think it's fair for someone to be protected when they were an equal participant in the "scandal" being reported.

I'll leave the issue of privacy protection to the experts, but this one question lead me to another: in a situation where a married man cheats with a woman who knows full-well that he is married, is one party guiltier than the other?

Yes, Arnold is the celebrity in this situation, but he did not act alone. He cheated on his wife with someone who worked in their home, but the "former staffer" had sex with her married employer. Is what he did worse? I don't know. But she is not innocent.

Let's assume he pursued her, worked hard to convince her, and made all the arrangements to have and hide the affair. Does that make him more guilty?

Is there a scenario in which her luring him, convincing him and insisting he hide all the evidence makes her more at fault?

I don't know the answer. I know people who have been involved in the situation and no matter how you slice it, it always feels like the person in the relationship is more in the wrong. Logically I know that's not correct.

This latest gossip really tests the question best. You've got a world famous actor-turned-politician with intense physical strength having an affair with a person he employs. It feels like he must be the villain, and lord knows we'll treat him that way. But is this unnamed former staffer at equal or less fault? And, back to the original question, what does the LA Times move to keep her identity a mystery mean relative to that bigger question?

Monday, May 23, 2011

Project 365: Day 93


Day 93, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

The Museum of Contemporary Art in Little Tokyo's current exhibition is Art in the Streets, the first major U.S. museum exhibition of the history of graffiti and street art. The exhibition traces the development of graffiti and street art from the 1970s to the global movement it has become today, concentrating on key cities where a unique visual language or attitude has evolved.

Art in the Streets showcases installations by 50 of the most dynamic artists from the graffiti and street art community, including Fab 5 Freddy (New York), Lee Quiñones (New York), Futura (New York), Margaret Kilgallen (San Francisco), Swoon (New York), Shepard Fairey (Los Angeles), Os Gemeos (São Paulo), and JR (Paris).

A special emphasis (and one of my favorite parts) is placed on photographers and filmmakers who documented graffiti and street art culture including Martha Cooper, Henry Chalfant, James Prigoff, Steve Grody, Gusmano Cesaretti, Estevan Oriol, Ed Templeton, Larry Clark, Terry Richardson, and Spike Jonze.

MOCA is a massive space and Art in the Streets features several shows within the show. There is a special section dedicated to the Fun Gallery, which connected New York graffiti artists with the downtown art community in the early 1980s. The Fun Gallery installation features the work of Keith Haring, Jean-Michel Basquiat, and the graffiti artists who shaped the gallery’s history. A section dedicated to the seminal film Wild Style (1983), co-curated by the film’s director Charlie Ahearn, will document its influence on the global dissemination of graffiti and hip-hop culture. A highlight of the exhibition was a Los Angeles version of Street Market, a re-creation of an urban street complete with overturned trucks by Todd James, Barry McGee, and Steve Powers.

There were several school groups (middle schoolers) taking in the exhibition, which was both great and a little disturbing. There are several graphic images of naked men and women and lots of photos of penis. I'm not sure I would like to be the parent chaperon having to tell kids to move along quickly. But still, kids taking in culture is pretty damn awesome.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Project 365: Day 92


Day 92, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.
Shira and I had a nice evening at my favorite Turkish place on the Westside eating GIANT platters of food (this picture is one of two), drinking tea, and enjoying a mint hookah. And we finally made it to Yogurtland! Oh yeah, we also did things that didnt involve food but I cant remember what.
 

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Project 365: Day 91


Day 91, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Shira and I went over to the Annenberg for the opening day of their newest exhibition.

Beauty is different things to different people, different cultures and different time periods. The model Twiggy in the late 1970’s made the ultra-thin look beautiful; Peter Paul Rubens in 1600 helped to coin the term “Rubenesque” with his paintings of full figured women. While beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder, societal ideals and pressures certainly help to form our opinions of what is beautiful, and to that end the Annenberg Space for Photography is presenting a new exhibit to trace the culture of beauty. The aptly named “Beauty CULTure” exhibit is a photographic exploration of how feminine beauty is defined, challenged and revered in modern culture. Women have shouldered the burden of the beauty cult, spending billions of dollars every year in makeup, fashion and even plastic surgery—and as Annenberg says in their press release, “As much as beauty can astonish and inspire, it can also corrupt and subvert.”

Friday, May 20, 2011

project 365: day 90


day 90, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

After Executive Staff Meeting, I'm going to run down the halls shouting TGIF! Shira is in town and we've got places to see and things to eat. Yogurtland, The Counter, Homeboy Bakery, Gloria's, Sofra's... all my usualy hangouts. Shira said she wanted to see what my life is like and here it is, food and working out.

In other news, they still sell Four Loko in South Bay for those that need a quick pick-me-up. Arent these things illegal?

Thursday, May 19, 2011

project 365: day 89


day 89, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

We went to Louisa's for lunch today because it's close to the office AND I had a groupon for a Yogurtland-esce place in Larchmount. I love that when I say to anyone that I ate at Louisa's they always say "ohh, the bread is so good". Forget about the food, which is also very good; the bread is where it's at.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Project 365: Day 88


Day 88, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

After I saw Chip Heath at NAYDO I knew I needed to read his book on business change theory ASAP. So I put it on my list and swore that as soon as I got my LA County Library card, I would reserve it (and probably wait 3 months until it came in). Well now I can put "Get a Library card" on the same list as "Get a CA Driver's License" thanks to my boss who gave me the book.

Shira flys in tonight, please pray for easy non-parallel parking.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Project 365: Day 87


Day 87, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Guests in LA beware... I will drag you to Yogurtland. Wendy Bart is the second Seattle victim of my obesssion. Shira has been starving herself for our 6 day Yogurtland Marathon that will start on Thursday. I refuse to spend more than $3 at YL for the following reasons 1- I've decided that $2.81 is a proper serving  and 2- I usually have less than $3 cash in my wallet on any given day.

Remember cash? That green, waxy paper stuff that features one of several dead presidents or Ben Franklin?

Well, for upwards of eight years, I didn't. Never carried it. Never used it. Couldn't tell you which guy went with which dollar amount. My preferred currency was plastic and like most of us slaves to the magnetic strip, I swiped with reckless abandon.

Sure, I applied my version of mental checkbook balancing to each purchase, but come the end of the month my numbers never quite subtracted up.

I was in need of serious spending self-help -- a solution that would remind me of the value of the almighty dollar and stop me from swiping without thinking.

And so I went to the halls of self-improvement (the third floor of the Santa Monica Barnes and Noble) and sought out the advice of the fiercest financial contributor to any morning news program. A woman who would have made Mr. Potter feel like a spendthrift. A woman who lives and breathes efficiency from the tips of her toes to the top of her haircut. The one and only Suze Orman.
That was last week. I haven't followed her advice yet (cash only lifestyle) but my cash only lifestyle will begin June 1st. Who wants to join me?

Monday, May 16, 2011

Project 365: Day 86


Day 86, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

It's regional training time, which means I'll be spending the next two weeks in trainings/professional development opportunities. This also means I will snack. A lot. Today, I ate what one would think is an impossible amount of gold fish.
I've been on a indoor cycling (Spinning for all you non-Y folk) kick, steadily adding classes to my workout schedule until I reached my max of 6 classes in 7 days. This number includes the class I teach on Tuesdays at Culver Palms at 6am.
Now that I'm cranked my cardio up, I need to find some balance with strength training and yoga. So far, I've been attending 1 yoga class on Saturdays after my marathon 2 hour cycling session. Candace, this is where you come in. Maybe you should be my faux yoga instructor....

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Project 365: Day 85


Day 85, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

It's so great to have a great digital camera in my hand. Seriously, all you need to do is point this thing at any subject and BAM, instant art. I tweeted some of the photos I took and I'm pleasantly surprised my the feedback and reactions. Maybe I should resume my photography hobby AND spend more time on twitter (positive reinforcement is AWESOME!)

I was against Twitter the first time I heard about it. It was year, maybe two years ago, and Alex and I were having one of our 10:00am catch-up breakfasts in which he lectures me about how to get more traffic for my original website (whitepeoplemusic.org RIP), I lecture him about how to properly date, and neither of us really listens. Joining Twitter was his reco of the day. Join as WhitePeopleMusic, he told me, and tweet snippets from your blog posts or other thoughts you have that are relevant to what you write.

It am not great at a lot of things (saving money, dressing up, expressing heartfelt affection without a follow-up joke) but I am terrible at a select few thing, and being an early adopter to new technology is one of them (the other ones are math, science, and disguising my reaction to things I find rude). So it wasn't so much that I didn't appreciate the idea of Twitter, it was more that I couldn't figure out how to use it. Yes, I now know that it's a Facebook wall with a 140 character limit, but at the time it was very overwhelming slash hard to read.

To say that Twitter is huge would be boring - it is, in the finally appropriate words of Rachel Zoe, "everything" - which is why I was surprised to hear Malcolm Gladwell - the man who first wrote about how something becomes so "everything" - come out so strongly against Twitter as a form of social change in his recent New Yorker article - Social Change: why the revolution will not be tweeted. (Yes, Shira, that shout out was for you)

I get his point - Twitter makes us lazy activists willing to throw 140 character support at any cause we have 30 seconds to re-tweet. Can Twitter really organize us, really move the social needle on anything from US policy reform to Iranian elections? I don't know. I've never thought about Twitter that way, and I'd venture to guess that neither have you.

Twitter is, above all, about self promotion. Whether your self is telling your 20 followers that the party you're at is bumpin' or that some comedian is hysterical or - more likely - that you're hysterical.

Can something so intentionally selfish ever motivate people in a new direction?

Twitter founder Biz Stone thinks so. He came out against Gladwell in a piece for The Atlantic. He points to all sorts of research proving the impact of Twitter - its use in charity fundraising, political organizing, and the like.
"Small Change" dismisses leaderless, self-organizing systems as viable agents of change. A flock of birds flying around an object in flight has no leader yet this beautiful, seemingly choreographed movement is the very embodiment of change. Rudimentary communication among individuals in real time allows many to move together as one--suddenly uniting everyone in a common goal. Lowering the barrier to activism doesn't weaken humanity, it brings us together and it makes us stronger."

I agree with both writers on the issue. Major social change the likes of the Civil Rights Movement will not be organized on Twitter, but at this point it will not go down without it.

So, what do you think?

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Project 365: Day 84


Day 84, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

EPIC Weekend! Actually, let me edit that EPIC Saturday/early Sunday AM. At 10am, I get a call from C telling me to meet the crew at The Forum. In typically fashion, I don't ask questions, instead jump into the car and pay for $25 parking. Turn's out G got everyone tickets to see Prince as a surprise. And that was only the beginning.

After watching Janelle Monae channel both Prince and James Brown in what I must say has been her finest performance yet (at least out of the 3 I've seen). The purple-one himself appeared, opening with "Let's Go Crazy". He certainly didn’t skimp, playing for more than three hours. I'd forgotten the incredible catalog Prince has to draw on: "Purple Rain," "Uptown," "Controversy" and "When Doves Cry" were among the hits played.

Then, just when I thought my heart couldn't take anymore, STEVIE WONDER took center stage with Sheila E. and Prince to a funky rendition of "Superstition". Stevie jammed on harmonica and did lead vocals with Prince and Sheila backing him up til Stevie wanted to play and they lead him to the keyboards as Prince played bass.  Amazing.

But wait... there's more. Let me introduce my favorite, new-to-me, bartender in LA. What a great way to end an EPIC night. Everyone got home safe thanks to my awesome designated driver skills.

Question of the night, how many people can you fit in a Range Rover? Apparently, 7.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Project 365: Day 83


Day 83, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

This AM I drove to La Canada Flintridge to attend a training so I can start the process of becoming a certified cycling instructor. After this training, I have 3 more to attend before I can officially start teaching, which puts a wrench in Culver's plan to have me start teaching a 6am class on TUESDAY.

Does this picture remind anyone else of Super Mario Brothers? Amazed you can find land like this in LA County.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Project 365: Day 82


Day 82, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Eating 1200 calories a day is one of the dumbest ideas i've had. dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.

Researchers from Tufts University analyzed the calorie content of a variety of supermarket and restaurant foods and found themselves asking the same question. In many cases, the actual calorie content of the food varied considerably from number of calories listed by the manufacturer or restaurant. This has significant implications for people who count calories to lose or maintain weight.
The entire basis of calorie counting is dependent on accurately assessing and adjusting one’s daily caloric intake based on their caloric needs. People looking to maintain their weight will generally consume about the same amount of calories that they need for the day, and those who want to lose weight will typically try to eat slightly less. Inaccurate calorie data could easily cause someone to consume more calories than intended and result in them gaining weight instead of losing or maintaining it.

And if there is one thing I know about me, I tend to be inaccurate. I think to round numbers down or up depending on my mood and my ability to add large numbers together is average, at best.

So, now that calorie counting is out the window, what's the next "thing" I should try?

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Project 365: Day 81


Day 81, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Either i'm going crazy or blogger lost one of my posts. So sorry, you wont be able to see my journalistic excellence with this one because my original post (that Im certain I wrote) was looonnnggg.

Boo technology.

And it's back (updated 5/18)

By my basic calculations, the American workforce is comprised of three types of people:


  1. people who are appropriately paid and appropriately worked - they make just what they deserve for the amount of time they put in
  2. people who are over paid and under worked - they make way too much and do way too little.
  3. And people who are under paid and over worked - essentially everyone I know slash the subject of this post.
Note: not discussed here is a fourth category comprised of people who think they're in one category but are actually in another. Those people are delusional, so we'll leave them out.

If you're familiar with the phrase "yeah, but a thousand people are in line for your job" then you fall into category number 3. Also, "it's about paying your dues to get ahead in this business" - "you can't put a price on connections" and "a name brand on your resume will get your further than savings in your '20s" Welcome to the 20-nothing work force, especially the workforce running world's biggest entertainment, media, and art industry companies.
And congratulations - really - you are the brightest and most creative 20-somethings in America. Accoring to my neighbor, these media jobs are not easy jobs to get and they're even harder jobs to keep. The sales pitch, according to said nieghbor is "you were selected from the most talented of the bunch for the greatest opportunities at some of the coolest brands in the world. You get to wear adorable things to work. You get to maybe be at the same parties as rich and famous people. If freebies come to the office and the important people don't want them, you can have them. You. Are. Lucky. And if anyone tells you otherwise well then they must have boring jobs at management-heavy companies that snuff their creative flames leaving them cold, bored, and Republican. Oh, and probably married. Fools."

I listening to a report on NPR the other day about bonuses given to those fools on Wall Street. From what I'm told a bonus is extra money added to your contracted pay in return for better work than usual, more work than usual, unexpected company earnings. Yes, if a company on the whole does very, very well for a year than they will give their employees a part of that success - in the form of money. Word to the not-yet-graduates: those industries are not, in general, entertainment, arts, non-profits, education, or media.

Why not? you accountants ask. Because our bonus is all the fun and experiences and connections and potential free tickets to things that come our way because we were lucky enough to work for X company in Y mega city. Our bonuses are about helping people and making a difference in the community. Do you know how many people want what we have? How many people will work longer hours for less pay?

I've been an eager and willing participant in the category 3 work force for five years. Once, for about six months I was paid an appropriate salary for the work I was doing but then I got promoted without a raise, twice.

But, see, here's my thing (and it's not just I'm bitter and exhausted):
  • there are things that are just the way things are because they have to be. Freelance health insurance is expensive because of the way our health insurance system technically works, and that's a numbers and cents game, for example.
  • Then there are things that are the way they are because they keep the world in check. You have to be a poorly paid resident before you can be a well-paid doctor because you don't know enough as a resident to do what a doctor does, point blank.
  • But it's when things are the way they are for no reason other than that the fat cats like getting fatter and 100 bright-eyed kids are in line for your job so sit down, shut up, and be grateful you have one.
Here in LA (and I'm sure everywhere) exists a workforce of people who are paid pennies for significant work because companies can get away with it - because we have no advocates other than the few saintly bosses who make a case for us - because this is just the way it is. Why? Because it can be. Why can it be? I have a few ideas. One of them is that much of the 20-something work force earns a salary that accounts for 75% of their adult life, and an allowance to cover the difference...

Add the recent recession to this already bad balance of power and you get kids leaving places like MTV, Conde Nast, LAUSD, Time Warner and the like because they can actually make more money waitressing. To say, "I can't afford my job" when it's at one of the most marquee brands in the world is sad - sad and seemingly unnecessary, especially when you read about the way companies like the recently folded Bon Apetite ran their businesses (much of their senior work staff still took company car service to and from work).

I wouldn't trade my industry or my experience for more money at a company I hate doing a job I don't want to do. I'm just saying, why does it have to be an either or? Why do the "cool" jobs get away with paying the least and expecting the most? Where's the check and balance?

When I first moved to LA I had this recurring dream where all the lowly paid employees of the world stormed out of their offices at X time on X day and met somewhere centurally located for a march down Wilshire yelling "what do we want? fair pay! when do we want it? within 6 months please!" and holding signs that read: If you ever want to see your dry cleaning again, give me $1,000....or....$850, final offer!! With each step a new company fell. Bosses didn't know how to contact HR to get temps in the office, or how to send an Outlook meeting invite, or if it's 3 cups of water and 2 scoops of 2 cups of water and 3 scoops of coffee. We. Were. Triumphant.

...Until we hit WEHO. There, dressed in cuter clothes and with far fewer bags under their eyes was a force of 20-somethings ready and willing to steal our key cards and pick up coffee for our bosses on the way to their new posts. "Don't do it!" we yelled. "You'll rack up a credit card bill!! You'll have to live in Downey!! You'll make a list of Happy Hours that serve free food and rotate them for dinner!!" But they weren't phased. They didn't care. See, they were "getting a little help from home" so they could pursue our dream jobs without worrying what they paid.

I'm not saying those kids and their parents are ruining the bell curve, but you do have to wonder what companies would do if they couldn't get their first 10 choices to accept a 27K starting salary...

I still wonder what would happen if we ever staged a full-on walk-out. The Writers Guild went on strike and they got what they wanted. But in the words of David from the acclaimed Disney musical Newsies, "What we need here's a union..." A union of category 3 workers who, when salaries got too bleak to live could mobilize all of the Manhattan assistants to drop our blackberries on our bosses desks with a note that reads, "If I touch this after 6pm I'm no longer making minimum wage."

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Project 365: Day 80


Day 80, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Lunch today with Thanh at Homegirl Cafe. Delicious tacos (tofu/potatoe, chicken/citrus, and mushroom/pepper). Great time chatting about development and planned giving. Yay, for lunch with co-workers!

In other news, I knew my life in LA would be different than my life in Seattle, but I didn't really know how – and that’s both how it would be different and how different it would be.

The answer is veryvery, very, very but what’s weird is that it’s not a difference I day-to-day feel.

I guess some people – in this case me - get to a new place and immediately start assimilating to what life is like there forgetting what they would have been doing at that same given time on that same given day a previous life ago. Like last week, while working out I got a text from Candace with an invite for tacos. I wasn’t thinking, if this were a Thursday at 9pm in Seattle I’d be drinking a whiskey ginger at a bar walking distance from the apartment. I’ve found that my mind just decided, this is life now, and moved on. And yet when I stop to think about just how insanely different every moment of my day now is, it’s a shock I’m not suffering more moments of what-the-hell-am-I-doing.
Take getting to work, for example. I now drive the car I pay for all by myself eight miles down the road to my office. That takes anywhere from twenty to forty minutes depending on what time I leave and what portion of Olympic they’ve decided to tear up next. I dress for this commute in whatever I intend to wear for the day. Professionally mind you. No going to work in sweats because I plan on working out first and then just find myself saying "well, I dont have any meetings today, so I'll just keep wearing sweats." Things like the distance I’ll have to walk or how freezing it might be on my route are not factors nor is whether or not my just-straightened hair will withstand the humidity I’ll encounter from point A to point B. First of all, there is no humidity and second, I don’t encounter anything but the interior of my car – a place I keep regulated (or will once I finally figure out how to use the heat/air).
The actual workday warrants its own post about the similarities and differences between office culture in SEA and LA (or more like the differences and similarity, that one item being, both include the word office).

Dinner is another cornerstone of differentiation. I have been in Los Angeles for something like 75 dinners? At least 50 of them have been consumed in a home, included more than three people and consisted of food prepared that night. Two weeks ago Sean and Candace made a three-course meal in twenty minutes on a weeknight. Almost every single Sunday I’ve busted out the cookbook I havent opened in 5 years and cook up some multi course meal.
If I want to go run some errands or pick up some groceries or pop over to the Urban Outfitters, I have to drive and park. So far I haven’t figured out how to drive and not park, but I’m getting closer. As such, I do all of that much, much less. It didn’t dawn on me until the other day that I hadn’t done an ounce of unintentional shopping since I arrived in LA. It used to be that I’d be on a purposeful walk from somewhere to somewhere else (i.e. work to grocery store) and suddenly find myself in a clothing/accessories/shoe/housewares store shopping for something that I just then decided I want/needed. Or, more often, that I’d decide to spend the afternoon strolling around with no real need for anything and then four hours later find myself three neighborhoods away with a a new pair of shoes, vintage framed paint-by-number and a jar of kosher pickles. Here I move with intention, mostly because I've found it challenging to both drive and look at all the shops I'm passing to see if there are sale signs in the windows.
New realizations of the blatantly obvious pop up every single day - like I have yet to don a pair of socks but have already lost two pair of sunglasses or they sell liquor at CVS here?! - as I slip out of the post-move haze and into a place where I can actually look back at life two months ago and marvel at what a difference a  few states make.

All of that said - I am proud to report that my commitment to not wearing sweatsuits - no matter how colorful - as legitimate ensembles remains very much in tact despite the peer pressure in this town.

 

Monday, May 9, 2011

Project 365: Day 79


Day 79, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Today, I had to give a presentation about myself to the office. As I was going through photos and decided what to put in my powerpoint. I was reminiscing about how  my SEA to LA going away party was a gut check on my life thus far.

There is a difference between typing the e-mail addresses of everyone you know into a g-mail "to" field and seeing those e-mail addresses arrive as people at your going away party. There are a lot of differences.

When you go through your Facebook friends slash brain to be sure you have everyone included it's a simple process of see name, think about person, invite or cut off from life entirely (Wait. Sorry. That's the process of determining who to inform that you have a new cell phone number, which I really need to change to 310).


But when you see those people gathered to say goodbye as you embark on a new phase of life in a city 1K miles away it becomes much more than a "let's have a drink." Each person is like a flood of memories/thoughts/mistakes/successes that can't be separated from the whole experience of your time in the city and yet, in many circumstances, don't know about each others' existence.

It's a mind trip. You sit there like this puppet master with no control of the puppets - like an audience member in the scene you've been acting in for 10+ years.


And then - to make matters all-the-more bizarre - everyone gets drunk and monologues at you about what you mean to them, what you're about to experience in LA, and precisely what they think about that.

GUEST
Shalimar....Shalimarshalimarssshhhaaallliiiimmmaa.....


(pause, sip drink, gather more audience)

Leett me tell you about the first time I met Shhhaaalllimmmaarr Gonzaals...


ME
It's Gonzales.

GUEST
Right. Rightrightrightright.
Again and again and again.

The whole concept of world's colliding is nerve-wracking in and of itself, but when those worlds are colliding in your honor it becomes...overwhelming? awkward? And yet also gratifying, heartwarming, and the like. It's hard to describe and, while incredibly significant to experience, I can't quite recommend moving away just so you can have a going away party. (But if you do that, I won't judge).

I was a lot of things at my Farewell to SEA - nostalgic about the past, grateful for the effort people made to attend, nervous that everyone was having a good time. But mostly, I was proud. Proud of the scene, proud of the memories, proud of what we all accomplished here together.

My life in Seattle was a great, great life because my people in Seattle are great, great people. And while none of that changes, or rather, while none of them change when I left - there is a pausing of this chapter, at that place, at that time. I've been saying, "oh with Facebook and twitter and gchat, I won't be far," but in reality, I will.

My Friday night party was the first time I saw exactly what I was leaving gathered in one room. I was sad. Very sad. I am by no means done with Seattle or itching to leave any of the people in it. But what got me through the night with little-to-no tears was the fact that everyone in that room said, "go." We're excited for you, we believe in you, we think this is right for you, we know you're going to be just fine.

So maybe that's the real purpose of a going away party. Not a "Shalimar, This Is Your Life" session to make you miserable about what you're leaving behind, but for what you're leaving behind to help you realize that they're okay being left.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Project 365: Day 78


Day 78, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

OMG, I'm turning into quite the chef. Today I woke up, went to the Mar Vista Farmer's Market to pick up some local veggies and meet Kenya. After wandering around a bit, visiting the hummus guy, the homeboy bakery stand, and trying desperately to get flowers (bad idea on Mother's Day), I headed over to my home away from home- Whole Foods.

On the menu tonight: seared sea scallops with asparagus and brown rice. After posting this picture on Facebook, P-Tana commented "Um, I feel like you've lied to all your Seattle friends...repeatedly. "

I guess I never tried to read a recipe in Seattle. Sorry, SEA Urban Family

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Project 365: Day 77

Day 77, originally uploaded by shalimargonzales.

Last night between reading tweets of the Pac/Mosley fight (anyone who thought Mosley was going to win is a buffoon) and eating Yogurtland, I read about a divorce of an old high school acquaintance AND watched the ensuing battle between said acquaintance and the significant other's friends as they argued over who was more abusive in the (now) failed relationship on Facebook.

In honor of my ability to watch this reality TV like display of behavior. I'd like to share my set of rules for engagement on the site - a list of behavior and activity parameters I think we should all be following because they make moral, logical, and social sense.
  • Rule #1 - If you wouldn't say it at full volume across a crowded room of everyone the person knows and cares about, don't write it on their wall. Examples include: "Did I hear you broke up with _______?" Or "Whaatt? Quitting your job next month and moving to LA??" Or "Do you remember anything about last night?" The wall is a place that everyone can see.
  • Rule #2 - If you are of the level friendship/relationship/marriage where you could text whatever it is you've decided to post on their wall directly to them, please do so. I think it's wonderful that you want your baby to have an amazing first day of work. I'm (pretty) sure your baby thinks it's wonderful to. I'm just not sure why we all have to be a part of that personal display of your private love. Same goes for, "what you up to tonight dog?" We have gchat/bbm/texting for a reason.
  • Rule #3 - If you look at a picture you've taken of another person and think anything less than, "this is a fair representation of this person's face and body" - don't tag them in it. That's mean.
  • Rule #4 - Status update should be updates on your status: short descriptions, messages, thoughts, links or the like. 250-word paragraphs (fine, 200 if we're not counting exclamation points and emoticons), three-times a day recounting your every move are overkill. Start a blog.
  • Rule #5 -"It feels like angels are dancing on my soul when you hug me" is not a group nor is "long text messages about how someone feels about me makes my day :)" - yes, the joining of a group is now "liking" and you can technically "like" the concept of those things, but - just - stop.
  • Rule #6 - Any status messages or wall postings relative to a TV show that any percentage of the viewing public might not yet have seen should be avoided at all cost. I live in LA now so this is even more of a problem, but no one watches TV the night it's on anyway, so don't ruin it.
  • And finally - Rule #7 - Just use your actual name as your profile name. Anything else is bizarre. Anything with hearts, stars or like shapes in it is criminal.